Directors of Privately-Held Companies Face New Risk
Think it's relatively "safe" to be a
director of a privately held company?
Think again. In the past, few of us were concerned
about potential liability in becoming a director of a
non-public, privately held company. As a result, we were
pleased to be a director of a friend's company or of a
family business. Sometimes, we were even given the
protection of a director's liability policy. But,
realistically, we felt there was little or no risk since
the principal of the company was the major or sole
stockholder. This situation may have been dramatically
changed!
Recently the federal court in Manhattan ruled against
the CEO and the directors of a privately held non-public
company that had filed for bankruptcy. The bankruptcy
trustee brought the suit on behalf of the corporation
and its creditors. The court found that the CEO overpaid
himself, declared improper dividends and improper loans,
and otherwise treated the company's treasury as though
it was his own. Moreover, the directors were found
jointly and severally liable along with the CEO. In
short, the court imposed the same standards on the
directors of a privately held company as is done with
public companies. The case is on appeal, but it is an
eye-opener as to what is happening in the world of
litigation of corporate activities.
What does this mean for the director
of a privately held firm?
The court case has potential
ramifications that every director should be aware of. If
the ruling stands on appeal, the risk to directors of
private companies will be the same as those of public
companies. They will be held accountable not only to the
stockholders, but to the corporation and its creditors,
even if the directors received no potential benefit.
This opens the door to creditors who may now look to the
directors in a private company and go after their assets
in addition to those of the company. An Advisory Board
is a viable option, providing great value with less
risk.
As opposed to a corporate board, an Advisory Board is
a meaningful alternative. Advisory board members have
virtually no legal responsibility, no approval
obligations, no authority, no governance, no overview,
no voting. They provide only an advisory role. This is
something that owners should seriously consider if they
wish to continue to avail themselves of the valuable
benefits of having objective outside perspective and
knowledge in the running of their business. It allows
them access to invaluable business advice while
lessening the risk for participants.
Board participants must be ever so diligent in
accepting positions on corporate boards. Even the
unknowing director, well motivated and attentive to his
directorate duties, may find him or herself as a
responsible party. All of us should consider taking
alternative paths to both assisting companies and
protecting ourselves.
Jay L.
Fialkow
© 2003
RossFialkow Capital Partners, LLC
More Articles |